Eighth Circuit
Percefull v. Claybaker, 211 Fed. Appx. 521, 523 (8th Cir. 2006) (unpublished) (“Claybaker himself admitted that there was no legal or judicial authorization for seizing Percefull’s boat, which undermines his argument that no reasonable person in his position would have known that he was violating Percefull’s rights. Nor did Claybaker provide any type of predeprivation hearing, although the evidence is disputed on whether the necessity of quick action rendered such a hearing impractical. Although Claybaker argues that Percefull had no protected property interest in his unregistered boat, he does not assert that the failure to register the boat authorized its seizure.”).