Eighth Circuit
Elder v. Gillespie, No. 21-1826, at *12 (8th Cir. Dec. 9, 2022) (“We conclude that beneficiaries have a clearly established right to be provided adequate notice of reduction, loss, or termination of benefits.”).
Freeman v. Blair, 862 F.2d 1330, 1332 (8th Cir. 1988) (“It is inconceivable that in the circumstances of this case objectively reasonable officials could have thought they had constitutional warrant to summarily suspend plaintiffs’ business license and thus deprive plaintiffs of their means of livelihood. Indeed, we have no doubt that the law to the contrary was clearly established, especially in view of the fact that defendants have made no showing that a predeprivation hearing was impracticable or impossible—which it obviously was not.”).
Craft v. Wipf, 836 F.2d 412, 416 (8th Cir. 1987) (“By 1982, it was clearly established that the government must accord procedural due process before depriving a person of a protected property interest.”).
Strickland v. Inlow, 519 F.2d 744, 746 (8th Cir. 1975) (“The failure to inform the plaintiffs of the time and place of the Board meeting was violative of their right to procedural due process, for fundamental to that concept is adequate notice and the opportunity to be heard.”).