Barton v. Taber, 908 F.3d 1119, 1125 (8th Cir. 2018) (“We . . . reject Martin’s contention that it was not clearly established on September 12, 2011, that booking Barton into jail would constitute deliberate indifference to Barton’s serious medical needs.”).
Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 967 (8th Cir. 2016) (“As recounted above, the complaint alleged facts that Barton exhibited symptoms substantially more serious than ordinary intoxication and that Owens was aware of these symptoms and of the fact that Barton had recently been in a vehicular accident. Accordingly, we hold that, under these circumstances, a reasonable officer would ‘comprehend that he was violating [Barton’s] clearly established constitutional rights.’”).
Thompson v. King, 730 F.3d 742, 750 (8th Cir. 2013) (“Given this precedent, a reasonable officer would have known that a constitutional violation occurs by deliberately disregarding Johnny’s serious medical needs in the circumstances Officer King confronted.”).
McRaven v. Sanders, 577 F.3d 974, 980 (8th Cir. 2009) (“A detainee’s right to medical treatment is clearly established.”).